Friday 21 June 2013

Two Islamic Hellholes Stage Set-Piece Argument at the UN.

Afghanistan & Pakistan have had a mild falling-out with regard to the awful, awful terrorists using their territories as hiding places & planning attacks on their dear friends in the West. As if anyone (outside of Washington or Westminster) is still under the impression that either of these two basket-cases are serious about stopping Taliban terror, or gives the remotest damn about their Western benefactors. This, from Pakistan Today yesterday (if you know what I mean):

Pakistan, Afghanistan trade accusations at UN over extremist havens

Afghanistan and Pakistan traded accusations in the UN Security Council on Thursday over the whereabouts of extremists on their porous border as the United Nations described increased tensions between the neighbours as "unfortunate and dangerous."

Afghanistan's UN envoy, Zahir Tanin, told a council debate on the situation in Afghanistan that "terrorist sanctuaries continue to exist on Pakistan's soil and some elements continue to use terrorism as an instrument of foreign policy."

Pakistan's UN ambassador, Masood Khan, said "terrorists operate on both sides of the porous border" and that many attacks against Pakistan were planned on Afghan soil. He said aggressive policing and border surveillance were needed.

"We must not allow terrorists to manipulate and divide the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan," Khan told the council.

He told Reuters in an interview afterward that Tanin had been "ill-advised" to raise the border issues at the Security Council as Kabul and Islamabad were already talking through other channels. Khan blamed Afghan President Hamid Karzai for stoking tensions.

"When President Karzai meets our leadership he's most gracious, engaging, he's a statesman, but when he talks to the media he says things which inflame sentiment and that's most unhelpful and destabilising," Khan said. "We have given very restrained responses."

Pakistan's military played a key role in convincing Afghan Taliban leaders to hold talks with the United States, US and Pakistani officials said, although Afghan anger at fanfare over the opening of the Taliban's Qatar office this week has since delayed preliminary discussions.

"We were talking to multiple interlocutors behind the scenes and we have been asking them to participate in these talks, (telling them) that we think the war should come to an end," Khan told Reuters.

'SUCCEED OR FAIL TOGETHER'

US-backed Afghan forces toppled the Taliban in late 2001 for refusing to hand over al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

Pakistan helped the Taliban take power in Afghanistan in the 1990s and is facing a Taliban insurgency itself. The Pakistani Taliban, known as the Tehreek-e-Taliban, is a separate entity from the Afghan Taliban, though allied with them.

"Stability and sanctity of Pakistan-Afghanistan border is a shared responsibility. Robust deployment of Pakistani troops on our side is meant to interdict terrorists and criminals," Khan told the council. "This must be matched from the other side."

A spate of cross-border shelling incidents by the Pakistani military, who said they were targeting Taliban insurgents, has killed dozens of Afghan civilians in the past couple of years.

"We are very concerned with ongoing border shelling," Tanin told the council. "This constitutes a serious threat to Afghan sovereignty and the prospect of friendly relations between the two countries."

UN special envoy to Afghanistan, Jan Kubis, told the Security Council that the heightened tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan were a serious concern, especially at this stage of Afghanistan's development.

"Such tensions are unfortunate and dangerous," he said.

The NATO command in Kabul on Tuesday handed over lead security responsibility to Afghan government forces across the country and most foreign troops are due to withdraw from the country by the end of 2014.

"It is for the two countries to address these concerns and problems and their underlying reasons, to build trust and to refrain from any step that could contribute to an escalation of tensions and inflamed public sentiments," Kubis said.

"They share common concerns and interests in fighting terrorism. They can succeed or fail together" he said.

Have you ever encountered such a transparent raft of platitudes in all your life? "They share common concerns and interests in fighting terrorism." Says this Kubis character, do you suspect that Tanin & Khan shared a smirk as he said that?

This reminds me of one of those dysfunctional couples who turn up to the pub, have a set-piece tiff in front of everybody & then go back home & have rampant make-up sex. If only there was something we in the West could do to help, maybe some more money..?

No comments:

Post a Comment